![]() Julia, and many other women have proven that systemic, institutionalized sexism can no longer prevail in the society we live in now, as it is run by a republic of women refusing defeat. institutions are slowly, but surely dwindling. With naked pride, Louis-Dreyfus exposes the truth white, male-dominated U.S. ![]() That being said, Louis-Dreyfus’s surprising nude body, marked with the nation’s most important document, seems to make a statement about “the people’s” supposed, “protection under the law.” The fact that the words inked on Louis-Dreyfus’s body are temporary and, admittedly, historically inaccurate, suggests that these words have proven to be ineffective, if not entirely inaccessible to most of the population. However, the more I thought about it, I began to realize that a critique of the photo shoot would be more ineffective than Rolling Stone’s slightly problematic attempt at exhibiting female empowerment. At first I was a bit skeptical about the productiveness of Louis-Dreyfus’s unexpected nudity, especially the photograph of a white-wigged fellow tattooing her lower back. Despite the misprinted John Hancock signature sitting right above Louis-Dreyfus’s luminescent derriere, the image itself is rather shocking. Julia Louis-Dreyfus appears on the most recent cover of Rolling Stone Magazine wearing nothing but the preamble of the U.S Constitution – and perhaps a little more.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |