![]() Imperialism lies at the heart of the explanation. By focusing on why the British rejected the proposal to form an Armenian legion and the implications, if any, for the Armenian genocide and the Allied discussions on where to attack the Ottoman empire during the first four months of 1915, this article offers important new insights into why the British and French failed to do anything to prevent the Armenian genocide, and got it wrong with their decision to land forces at Gallipoli in April 1915 instead of at Alexandretta. Nothing of substance has been published on the initial proposals to form an Armenian legion, and on its connection to the Armenian genocide and the proposed British landing at Alexandretta. This article scrutinizes and questions the British decision to reject Armenian proposals to form a legion of Armenian volunteers in 19, especially since in late 1916 the French, with British approval, established an Armenian legion (until 1919 called the Legion d'Orient) and because the first proposals for a legion were connected to British considerations, also overlooked, to land a force at Alexandretta. Scrutinizing and questioning contentious and failed policy decisions should result in discussing ‘ifs, buts, and maybes’, particularly when there are policy alternatives. But in spite of this, one can approach the main bookstores in any city, and see in the canopies and shelves, illustrated books on the Wermacht, on Sherman or Panzers tanks, in better locations-and surely sales-than books that commemorate the hundred years of the Great War. 2014 marks the beginning of a series of commemorations, events and publications that will once again bring to the forefront one of the most definitive and defining armed conflicts in the history of humanity on the occasion of its centenary. At last the year has come, the date many historians, especially those who study war or military affairs, looked forward to rediscover, rethink and rewrite the history of the Great War. Gallipoli synthesizes the end and the beginning of a new world in the middle of an impossible battle. As well as a new beginning for hundreds of immigrants from the Ottoman dominions that arrived until Colombian coasts. To one side is something called a memory holewhen Winston puts things in it, he assumes they are burned and lost forever. ![]() He sits at a table with a telescreen in front of him that watches everything he does. He works for the state, and his job is to rewrite history. In the context of the commemorations of the Great War, it is worth recalling the Gallipoli or also know as the Dardanelles campaign in 1915 as a turning point on the eastern front of the war and as an event that meant the end and the beginning of events that are Of vital importance today, a century later: The end of the Ottoman Empire as an administrative organ that ruled in the Middle East for almost five centuries and the beginning of imperialist intervention in this region, with its consequent generation of conflicts. The protagonist of 1984 is a man named Winston Smith.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |